HOME - Back to board
 

Moderation queue filter issues

ao - 2013-11-10 21:43

You've probably noticed some posts appearing late or not at all.  It appears the issue with our Moderation queue filter is back again.  If we add trigger terms in an attempt to ensure you guys aren't subjected to the constant stream of spam posts for Nike Air trainers and Abercrombie gear for some reason many posts are randomly quarantined for no apparent reason.  Every day I have to release 10-15 innocent posts which have been snared up in the filter.

 

It seems that a fix isn't imminent so, we either....

 

1.  Remove all trigger terms to stop this happening but you will see a lot more crap posts for jewellery and trainers

 

2.  Keep it as it is but possibly valuable posts will randomly go missing.

 

I vote '1'

northerner - 2013-11-10 22:55

Aye, release the spam, better than the frustration of missing posts

toocool4 - 2013-11-10 23:35

I still think new users should have to be authorised by moderators before they can post. That way they can’t just sign on then post. They will have to sign on and them come back at a later date to post after they have been authorised. This will slow them down.

 

By the way 2. Keep the spam filter.

ao - 2013-11-11 00:06

Originally Posted by toocool4:

I still think new users should have to be authorised by moderators before they can post. That way they can’t just sign on then post. They will have to sign on and them come back at a later date to post after they have been authorised. This will slow them down.

 

By the way 2. Keep the spam filter.

The problem we have is that despite what you think, Retro and myself aren't on 24-hour alert to approve content, which, as I'm sure you'll agree, can be frustrating for a new member bubbling with enthusiasm about finding this treasure trove of a forum for the first time.

nickfish - 2013-11-11 00:45

We dont get more than a couple of legit new members a day do we?
My other thought is this:
The spam posts always contain similar products and similar bad english so are likely from the same source. Since this source is clearly not getting much business as a result of their efforts there must be another reason why they do it.
Has someone really pissed someone else off in the past and this is the revenge?

The spam filter is pretty frustrating but it does not stop all of the spam anyway so its probably a waste of time. How many spam threads do we get? 2 or 3 a day? Easier to spot and delete them i would have thought. Can you create a sandbox where mods or a couple of deputies can chuck suspected spam in before deletion?

northerner - 2013-11-11 01:38

Well I'm on most of the day on and off so wouldn't object to deleting spam as long as it can be done via iPhone

seb968 - 2013-11-11 02:49

I vote for 1, quarantine of posts is quite disruptive.

toocool4 - 2013-11-11 04:05

Originally Posted by agentorange:
Originally Posted by toocool4:

I still think new users should have to be authorised by moderators before they can post. That way they can’t just sign on then post. They will have to sign on and them come back at a later date to post after they have been authorised. This will slow them down.

 

By the way 2. Keep the spam filter.

The problem we have is that despite what you think, Retro and myself aren't on 24-hour alert to approve content, which, as I'm sure you'll agree, can be frustrating for a new member bubbling with enthusiasm about finding this treasure trove of a forum for the first time.

Hey sorry agentorange i did not know it's just 2 of you guys doing the moderation.

mitchelljames - 2013-11-11 04:43

Option 1, we can always put the filter back if we get overloaded by spam.

samovar - 2013-11-11 07:13

Originally Posted by NickFish:
The spam posts always contain similar products and similar bad english so are likely from the same source. Since this source is clearly not getting much business as a result of their efforts there must be another reason why they do it.
Has someone really pissed someone else off in the past and this is the revenge?

Same thought has repeatedly crossed my mind. It would be interesting to compare the nicknames of the serial spammers and see if a pattern emerges. One of them was: stereo2god, hmmm...

 

I have a suggestion for one potentally effective anti-spam measure. But I'll keep it secret, so that spammers won't know it. The idea is that no counter-measure is effective if you don't know what the measure is

 

I'll send a pm to our mods, and see what happens. As for the poll, I vote 1

retro - 2013-11-11 07:13

I vote option 1 with character recondition and e-mail link confirmation for new registers if it hasn't already been implemented.

ao - 2013-11-11 07:18

One thing I have noticed is they always choose 'female' as their gender, so I wager they're either the same person or the same group.  Ban females perhaps? 

 

On average I have to delete one spam post a day, not sure if Retro does more?  So, yeah, I favor removing the filters all together but you're going to see a lot of crap from time to time.

ao - 2013-11-11 07:19

To add, I've just found Sal's above post lodged in the Mod queue.

 

Retro, is it worth pinging Paul about this, there is only five terms in the filter, it has to be a fixable issue?

ao - 2013-11-11 08:56

In fact former respected member James Craven Price nails the issue in this informative and concise video - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...amp;feature=youtu.be

Yada, yada

northerner - 2013-11-11 09:01

James votes 1

deliverance - 2013-11-11 09:15

james never gives up 

docs - 2013-11-11 09:36

Vote 1 and review current process.

deech - 2013-11-11 09:51

I vote 1 ! Thanks

michiel - 2013-11-11 09:56

1

brutus442 - 2013-11-11 09:57

Geez my last post to this thread is "awaiting moderation"

 

I really am a bad influence

northerner - 2013-11-11 10:08

Yeh your double posts are a menace lol

brutus442 - 2013-11-11 10:14

Originally Posted by Northerner:
Yeh your double posts are a menace lol


I knew there was I reason Si.....off to delete my stutter...

smeats1976 - 2013-11-11 13:38

I vote for 1! gimme some spam

 

 

Spam_with_cans

seb968 - 2013-11-11 13:50

Originally Posted by smeats1976:

I vote for 1! gimme some spam

 

 

Spam_with_cans

Yum Yum!!

brutus442 - 2013-11-11 13:52

I vote for #1

 

I buy half of my Abercrombie apparel through these legit links

 

Less frustration when it comes to posting. I know some of my posts are floating out there somewhere

northerner - 2013-11-11 14:06

Lol...spam fritters...tasty

Well I'm happy to be a spam deleter if that's feasible tho I've offered my services before and it wasn't taken up so I don't suppose it will this time either lol

smeats1976 - 2013-11-11 14:20

yeah! give Si "the power"

seb968 - 2013-11-11 14:24

Originally Posted by smeats1976:

yeah! give Si "the power"

Yep! I second that!

northerner - 2013-11-11 14:41

No we've got to FIGHT THE POWER!! Lol

smeats1976 - 2013-11-11 15:08

Originally Posted by Northerner:
No we've got to FIGHT THE POWER!! Lol

 

radio_raheem-radio